Bible Code Prophecy
Do long bible codes prove that they are valid?
Why I do not use the scientific method to find bible
codes!
And, a confession about the inherent weakness of bible
codes.
******************
First, the letter
to me:
There is only one way to test the Bible code. First, every
letter of the books of Moses, as well as Deuteronomy, must be randomized.
Then the same software that looks for words must be employed. If the same,
or other messages are found, then we know that as Niels Bohr said,
randomness rules the Universe. Einstein countered that "God does not
play dice with the Universe!".
Bohr told Einstein, "Stop telling God
what to do".
Do the necessary work, get off of your chosen
people award, and check the consequences. Science is proof, not blind
belief.
My answer:
Hi!
Did
you know that even random text can produce what at first look appear to be
some-what garbled real sentences! The fact of the matter is that Hebrew is
ideally suited to form codes. This does not mean that there are no genuine
bible codes, but it does call for a large degree of skepticism. I have seen
whole paragraphs of supposed Hebrew on the internet, but after many years of
study in this phenomena I am convinced that the vast majority are just
random chance. There may be error mixed in with the codes on this site too.
Remember, codes are not on the same level as the plain bible. God will not
have it so. You will have to judge whether a line of code on this website
has a ring of truth to it and something worthy of God or not. However, one
will always have a degree of uncertainty as to validity when it comes to
codes. That's just the way it is. Again, God would not have it otherwise,
lest men elevate codes above the plain reading of God's word.
Sometimes there may be a code even though the grammar is terrible. For
instance, I would have dumped the Moth Bible Code long
ago for this reason if it were not that it seemed to have come true, as
odd as it was.
Thus,
not all codes on this site are equal. There are a few codes on this site
that I, myself, have some doubts about whereas others I have no reasonable
doubt. The
Mene Tekel Bible Code
(in its
simplified
version) and the Hand code
are perhaps the soundest codes. (
Also of high reliability is the Yeshua Bible Code
and especially the
Balance Bible Code
(except for some of the details about the
hurricanes
--- yes, it is possible that I took it too far!), and then the
Lamb Bible Code. The Lion/Acrostic Bible Prophecy
is also very powerful, though the massive acrostic is admittedly choppy at
points which give grounds for some doubt, though I personally am convinced
of it. The Menorah, too,
is powerful and whatever it lacks in Hebrew it makes up for in numeric. Also
see the acrostic in the
genealogy
and names code. I am also reasonable convinced of them. The rest I
have less confidence, though for certain subjective reasons I think they are
genuine and thus I leave them posted for now on the website. But as far as
proving anything, I do not believe some of the codes on this site will at
all do that.
If one is seeking 100% proof then I think that they will be disappointed
with the codes. But this goes for bible prophecy in general too, for the
skeptics are right when they point out that many bible prophecies (though
not all --- just like the codes) can be interpreted in different ways. But
even if you saw Jesus rise from the dead with your own eyes, could you be
sure that you were simply not imagining it or that it was not a deception of
some kind?
In the end, God requires us to walk by a degree of faith. Why? Because
faith is a moral issue. The bible teaches that to fail to believe God
(generally speaking), though given the evidence, is a moral decision to
rebel and not a problem with a lack of evidence. God will supply the
evidence for those that seek it. Remember doubting Thomas? And so, my
studies in
bible numbers,
the
360 calendar, and in the bible
codes together give strong reason
The Bible-Code Digest site attempts to look at the codes that way. But
my purpose is not really to prove anything scientifically, but rather to
state what is there and to leave it for others to decide whether it be
random of not. I am personally convinced that it is not random, but I am
also convinced that it is possible to have whole paragraphs of ramblings
in Hebrew that kind of look like real speech but is not. There are many
such examples on the internet and there may be some of that on my site
too. It is not always easy to tell the difference. The following is an
article that I am
currently writing which addresses the issue that you are legitimately
raising.
s to believe that the Bible is God's book, for the bible codes interweave
with the
bible numbers
and the
360 calendar and always go
together. (This is one of my personal criterion for authenticity.)
But there will always be a degree of doubt, however small. You must choose
what to do with that small margin of doubt. Will you give God the benefit of
the doubt or cast off restraint for want of supposed 100% proof? Even in a
court of law there is always a degree of doubt, and yet there is that
subjective threshold that one must cross when one decides that "beyond
a reasonable doubt" such and such is true. Of course, whether one
believes the bible codes to be true is certainly not a salvation issue, but
whether one believes and obeys the bible is.
My ambition on this website was to declare the glory of God in the
numbers and codes and not to get hung up on attempting to prove something
scientifically as if God must bow to scientific protocol. I have declared
what I have found as best I could. You should test it and be blessed by
whatever you are reasonable convinced is true. And numerous signs and
wonders followed the opening of these picture bible codes to me, some
personal, but most international and some even in the heavens, and each
along a clear
numeric grid, and
so forth. Yes, this is subjective reasoning, but God never reveals Himself
through a servant to others without being personal and by leaving His
Almighty mark that vindicates His word. It would be contrary to the
character of God to do otherwise. For God is love. And whenever He reveals
His Son Jesus, He always does so in a personal and powerful way. So I am not
ashamed of the subjective side of what God has shown me, though admittedly
it may mean nothing to the skeptic. But it is what squeezes whatever small
degree of remaining doubt away, and grants me the courage, though sporadic
at times, to proclaim things considered controversial even to my brethren in
Christ. For had not God been on my side to watch over His words even when my
own faith waned I would long ago have bowed to men.
Bible Code Predictions
(My rant against
false predictions that people make
that cast doubt on those truly led by God!)
Also see General Marks of a Genuine Bible Code
What is
the purpose of bible code pictograms?
To home page
To index